Business charge card update

Report: 19
Date: 14 September 2009
By: DPS Specialist Investigations on behalf of the Commissioner and MPA Chief Executive

Summary

TThis report is to update members of progress made in reviewing and investigating the potential misuse of MPS Amex charge cards. It is based on information from the MPA Internal Audit and MPS Directorate of Professional Standards.

This review was first reported to Full Authority on 22 November 2007 and to Corporate Governance Committee on 14 March 2008, 12 June 2008, 11 September 2008, 8 December 2008, 23 March 2009 and 15 June 2009

A. Recommendation

That

1. members note the progress with ongoing investigations being undertaken by the Directorate of Professional Standards (DPS) and MPA Internal Audit; and
2. note the estimate of the likely time to complete the reviews and investigations by the Directorate of Professional Standards and resources required to do this.

B. Supporting information

Background

1. The American Express corporate charge card scheme was introduced in April 2003 as a means of reducing bureaucracy and the need to maintain temporary imprest accounts across the Service.

2. As at 22 November 2007 3,533 officers and staff had been issued with American Express cards, of which an average of 700 to 800 were used in any given month. The majority of cards are held in Specialist Operations and Specialist Crime Directorates.

3. Under previous Standard Operating Procedures (SOP), all cardholders were required to complete a claims form accounting for their expenditure, attaching original receipts and a copy of the relevant statement from American Express. The forms were then submitted through the supervising officer to Exchequer Services to be processed on the accounting system. To accommodate deployments outside the MPD cardholders were required under the SOP to complete this reconciliation within three months from the date of expenditure.

4. At 31 October 2007, unreconciled overdue transactions stood at £3.7m. This figure was made up of pre-April 2006 expenditure of £1.6m and post-April 2006 expenditure of £2.1m.

5. In October 2007 two officers were identified as misusing their issued Amex card through excessive personal spend. They were arrested by the DPS and both officers have subsequently been dismissed from the service. Both of these officers have now been convicted of the criminal offence of misconduct in a public office.

6. An exercise was conducted by the DPS to ascertain the possible extent of misuse of the Amex card system. In November 2007 the report was discussed with the then Deputy Commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson. It was decided that the current review and investigation of expenditure should take place.

7. It was decided that any outstanding Amex expenditure as of 1 October 2007 would be subject to the review process outlined below.

8. In addition it was decided that expenditure incurred and still outstanding prior to April 2006 would also be reviewed.

9. Following a review in January 2008 of the pre-April 2006 expenditure by Finance Services, Internal Audit and the Directorate of Professional Standards, it was decided that in relation to the pre-April 2006 accounts only, the files would be reviewed on an intelligence lead approach reviewing only the accounts of:

•  the 100 cardholders with highest value outstanding returns,
•  all officers of Chief Inspector and above,
•  anyone not previously included above but identified by Internal Audit’s analysis of the data and to require inclusion.

Review process

10. A review and investigation process was set up between the MPS finance section - exchequer services, the MPA internal audit and the DPS. The investigation was also referred to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) who decided to ‘manage’ the investigation in its entirety. This means that the IPCC has ‘direction and control’ of the investigation. The process to review expenditure is outlined below.

11. Step 1 - All cardholders were instructed to reconcile their accounts by line managers.

12. Step 2 - Exchequer Services updated the account database and made a first assessment on whether the expenditure was within the corporate charge card policy. All those deemed to have been outside the policy, for any reason, were referred to MPA Internal Audit.

13. Step 3 - Internal Audit reviewed the referred accounts and categorised them into:

•  Claims outside of the business card policy i.e. an officer should have used an alternative procurement process to purchase particular items of equipment or services for operational use. These files were categorised as category B files.
•  Claims outside of the business card policy that contained items of personal expenditure but were repaid by the officer within acceptable parameters. These files were categorised as category B files.
• Claims outside of the business card policy that were considered potentially unacceptable or without sufficient supporting documentation. These files were categorised as category A files.

14. Step 4 - The DPS review the findings of MPA internal audit and make a disposal decision.

15. It was agreed between all interested parties that due to the volume of files involved, those officers that are deemed to have category B files would receive no formal discipline sanction for their card use, but would receive ‘training and guidance’ with regards their use.

16. All files that were categorised A, receive a full review by the DPS. A decision is then made as to the disposal method, this includes:

• No further action taken.
•  Training and guidance to be provided.
•  The file is returned to the officer’s senior managers to administer local misconduct.
•  A formal investigation commences and a regulation 9 notice issued.
•  The file being allocated to a DPS caseworker for further enquiries to be conducted, before one of the above disposal methods can be decided.

Status of files within review system

Exchequer Services

17. Exchequer Services figures have been reported under the ‘Barclaycard Work stream’

MPA Internal Audit

18. Internal Audit has completed their routine review of documents forwarded to them by MPS Exchequer Services. The final stage of their review involved reviewing the claims of the 28 out of the182 officers identified in paragraph B9 above. These files were referred to Internal Audit by FSD. Of 28 files 21 related to officers of Chief Inspector rank or above. 12 of these officers were assessed as category A, (6 had retired) 6 were assessed as category B and 3 gave no cause for concern. Of the remaining 7 files, relating to officer below Chief Inspecting rank (1 had retired); all were assessed as category A. All 28 file were forwarded to DPS. Future work on Amex cards will be confined to dealing with queries and providing any support requested by DPS in their investigations.

Directorate of Professional Standards

19. The following is a breakdown of the number of cases dealt with so far by the DPS.

•  Five officers have been charged with criminal offences at this time.
•  Two of the officers charged have appeared at court and pleaded guilty to ‘Misconduct in a public office’. One with £82,000 of personal spend received a 10 month custodial sentence. One for £10,000 personal spend received 8 months suspended sentence, suspended for two years (Both officers resigned from the MPS prior to court proceedings).
• One of the officers charged pleaded ‘Not guilty’ to misconduct in a public office in relation to £12,000 of personal spend. Following a week trial he was convicted of the offence and subsequently received a sentence of 6 months suspended custodial sentence and 120 hours community service (This officer was dismissed at a fast track hearing prior to court proceedings).
•  - Seventeen cases relating to officers are currently with the CPS. (One of these officers is now retired).
• In addition to these officers there are also three members of the public that are on bail for offences linked to Amex use.
• One member of police staff has been arrested and is currently on police bail with the matter at the CPS. This case relates to the use of Barclaycard.
•  Three officers have appeared before misconduct hearings. One officer received a formal reprimand. Two officers received the sanction of deducted five days pay.
• Fourteen officers have received written warnings.
• One officer has received words of advice.
•  In addition to the above figures, five officers have also received regulation 9 notices informing them they are under investigation. These cases have not yet reached a disposal sanction.
• Two officers that have retired are under investigation and would have received a regulation 9 notice if still serving.
•  There are currently thirty-one cases that are being reviewed by DPS casework officers. These files have not reached a disposal sanction as shown above at 16.
•  There are currently six category A files that have been received from the MPA Internal audit, that have yet to be reviewed by the DPS decision maker.

20. Almost all cardholders who have been found to owe the MPA money have voluntarily repaid money. At this time it has only been necessary to consider legal process against two officers who have refused or been unable to re-pay monies. These two cases relate to one officer convicted of misconduct who owes £82,000 and another who owes £1,100. The Directorate of Legal Services is reviewing these matters.

21. Of recent media attention is the number of officers that will receive training and guidance in relation to their card use, as referred to at B15. This number currently stands at 1183 from MPA figures. The number will rise as DPS enquiries ascertain further cases warrant this sanction, following review. As stated above at 13 the majority of these cases are ones whereby the card was used outside of policy but for an operational purpose. It was agreed with the DPS, MPA, CPS and IPCC that a proportionate sanction in the circumstance was a guidance letter, stating that the card was previously used outside of policy and warning against further misuse. This guidance will be sent out in the form of a letter to all those concerned.

22. It is estimated that it all files will have received an initial review by the DPS by the end of September 2009. However, some matters will require further clarification by DPS caseworkers before a final decision can be made. The total number of cases that will require full investigation will be known, in the majority of cases, by the end of 2009.

23. The time to conclude the investigations is dependent on the judicial and discipline process. It is envisaged that the majority of cases will be at, or near conclusion, by the spring of 2010.

24. The DPS are currently supplying the staff and resources to complete this investigation and have the capacity to deal through to conclusion.

25. It should be noted that this review and investigation has identified significant organisational learning. Due to the recommendations made by the DPS, MPA internal audit and MPS exchequer services, significant improvement of financial control has been introduced, including:

• New corporate card introduced with more robust policy and supervision.
•  A review of overseas travel allowances paid to staff.
• An end to bespoke policies for differing parts of the organisation.
•  Revised corporate hospitality policy

C. Race and equality impact

The equality and diversity implications of this investigation continue to be monitored by the Director of Resources and the Directorate of Professional Standards.

D. Financial implications

1. All costs for this review and investigation are currently being met from existing budgets. This has required a significant redirection of resources within Exchequer Services, DPS and the MPA Internal Audit Forensic Branch. Business Groups have also had to dedicate resources to support this process. Resources will continue to be allocated until the reconciliation and related investigations are completed.

2. It is standard policy to recover any money owed to the Authority for any reason. Action will be taken to ensure that all funds are recouped where appropriate subject to legal advice.

E. Legal implications

1. In line with statutory requirements liaison is taking place with the CPS and IPCC with regard to criminal and discipline matters.

2. In line with relevant statutory requirements, action will be taken against officers/staff as appropriate through the MPS directorate of legal services to recoup any funds due to the Authority.

F. Background papers

None

G. Contact details

Report author: Moir Stewart, Commander Directorate of Professional Standards, and Peter Tickner, MPA Director of Internal Audit.

For information contact:

MPA general: 020 7202 0202
Media enquiries: 020 7202 0217/18

Send an e-mail linking to this page

Feedback