You are in:

Contents

Report 7 of the 13 Mar 03 meeting of the Equal Opportunities & Diversity Board and informs members of the proposed methodology for the stop and search scrutiny.

Warning: This is archived material and may be out of date. The Metropolitan Police Authority has been replaced by the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPC).

See the MOPC website for further information.

Stop and Search Scrutiny

Report: 07
Date: 13 March 2003
By: Clerk

Summary

This report informs members of the proposed methodology for the stop and search scrutiny.

A. Recommendations

That

  1. the proposed methodology for progressing the scrutiny be agreed.
  2. the membership be appointed – pages 16 and 17 of the terms of reference.
  3. Members note the proposed revised timescale for completing the scrutiny.

B. Supporting information

1. At its meeting on 9 January, the Equal Opportunities and Diversity Board approved a scrutiny into the disproportionality aspects of stop and search, and its usefulness as a policing tool. A preliminary outline was provided to the Board. A consultant with significant experience in policing and diversity issues has developed terms of reference and a methodology to enable the EODB to achieve the outcomes that are required for this important area of work. These are attached at Appendix 1.

2. In addition to the terms of reference and the methodology, the background report serves as an initial briefing document for members of the Scrutiny Panel as well as those researchers and others who will contribute to the project.

3. The document will also be used as a consultation document that will be placed on the MPA website to seek the views of the public on this area of work.

Project management

4. The scrutiny will be managed and progressed internally by Jude Sequeira, Policy Development Officer. Julia Smith will provide supervision and manage the delivery of the project. Derrick Norton will advise on MPA scrutiny protocol.

5. It was initially proposed that a student should be found to provide assistance with the research analysis. Two Universities have shown interest in this area of work, however, we are still awaiting details of their experience and work in this or similar areas.

6. Tim Rees, who was recently employed by the MPA to undertake the review of the consultation arrangements on Greenwich, is Equalities professional who has written several articles and a book on diversity and policing. He was instrumental in writing the background paper. Tim may be able to continue to assist the project by undertaking the research analysis, as well as providing external advice on the drafting of the final report. Subject to approval, it is proposed that he be asked to provide this role, on a consultancy basis, within the fee level previously proposed for a research student.

C. Equality and diversity implications

The report states that disproportionality in stop and search remains one of the big factors affecting the confidence of the minority ethnic community with the police service. The scrutiny aims to develop a way for the MPA and MPS to overcome the issues surrounding stop and search.

D. Financial implications

A detailed costing of the scrutiny will be prepared through development of the terms of reference and methodology. Costs will be contained within available budgets.

E. Background papers

None.

F. Contact details

Report author: Julia Smith and Jude Sequeira, MPA.

For more information contact:

MPA general: 020 7202 0202
Media enquiries: 020 7202 0217/18

Supporting material

The following is also available as a PDF document:

  • Appendix 1 [PDF]
    MPA scrutiny of the MPS performance and practice in Stop and Search - Feb 2003

Send an e-mail linking to this page

Feedback