‘Changing Habits’

Report: 9
Date: 6 September 2001
By: Clerk

Summary

Nicholas Long and Jennette Arnold have prepared a report ‘Changing Habits’ detailing their findings on conditions found in locker rooms, showers, WCs and other spaces within MPS police stations. They make twelve recommendations for action and improvements.

A. Recommendations

That:

1. the Human Resources and Finance, Planning & Best Value Committees receive the report and the initial response from the MPS; and
2. the FPBV Committee considers the financial implications of the proposals in the report

B. Supporting information

1. Following visits to fifteen police stations or offices earlier this year, two MPA Members, Nicholas Long and Jennette Arnold have prepared a report ‘Changing Habits’ (Appendix 1) detailing their findings on conditions found in locker rooms, showers, WCs and certain other spaces within MPS police stations.

2. The report makes twelve recommendations for action and improvements.

C. Financial implications

Appendix 1 proposes the creation of a fund (of £1.5 million) in 2001-02 for the purpose of meeting bids for package improvements to showers and WCs.

The medium term financial forecast agreed for submission to the Mayor by the FPBV Committee at its meeting on 19th June 2001, included in the expenditure projections for the financial year 2002/03 a proposed policy development of accommodation/environmental enhancements to support borough based policing. £2.9 million was identified specifically for refurbishment of locker room and showers, Disability Discrimination Act compliance work, increased levels of planned preventative maintenance of engineering plant to avoid build-up of backlog and maintain adequate working conditions. The final budget for 2002/03 and onwards is still subject to approval by the FPBV Committee and thereafter by the Mayor /Assembly.

The FPBV Committee will want to consider the request for the formation of a new reserve fund in the context of the 2001-02 out-turn which has already diminished general reserves and in the context of the performance of the current year’s expenditure against budget .

D. Background papers

None.

E. Contact details

The author of this report is Ruth Hastings Iqball, MPA.

For information contact:

MPA general: 020 7202 0202
Media enquiries: 020 7202 0217/18

Appendix 1: Changing Habits
Towards improved basic facilities for MPS officers

Summary

A report into conditions found by two MPA Members in locker rooms, showers, WCs and certain other spaces within MPS police stations together with twelve recommendations for action and improvements.

Recommendations

We recommend:

Of strategic or operational importance

1. MPS Management Board and the MPA in principle seek to identify potential underspend monies within the present financial year to aid a staff facilities improvement programme (paragraph 15)
2. the creation of a fund (of £1.5 million) in 2001-02 for the purpose of meeting bids for package improvements to showers and WCs (paragraph 20)
3. the MPS aims to ensure all locker rooms, showers and WCs conform to minimum criteria by 31 March 2009 (paragraph 17)
4. the structure of the cleaning contracts be reviewed and arrangements put in place to ensure proper on-site supervision of cleaners and their work, regular checking of performance and fast track remedies for failures to clean to agreed standards (paragraph 18)
5. the ordering of a MPS-wide deep cleaning programme of all showers and WCs together with a minor works repair programme to ensure a minimum level of cleanliness is achieved (paragraph 19)
6. OCU commanders should make formal inspections of staff facilities at least four times a year (paragraph 22)

Design issues

7. the devising of minimum standards for locker rooms, showers and WCs including design guidance (paragraph 16)
8. that mirrors (full length and head and shoulders) be provided as standard and that the placing of lockers on a projecting plinth be investigated (paragraph 23)
9. in future, save in exceptional circumstances, all new locker rooms must be in designated spaces conforming to minimum standards, including space and proximity to showers and WCs (paragraph 25)

Other matters arising

10. a consistent arrangement for the supply and maintenance of fitness equipment, TVs and other social amenities should apply at all MPS buildings (paragraph 12)
11. an urgent review of OCU archive filing arrangements (paragraph 13)
12. that investigation be made into the viability of the creation of a 'new for old' swap scheme where OCUs could exchange existing single lockers for double lockers at no additional or extra cost (paragraph 24)

Report

1 This brief report summarises our (Jennette Arnold and Nicholas Long) findings in our inspection of locker rooms, showers and WCs at various police stations, randomly chosen, around the MPS. The majority were visited jointly but several individual inspections also occurred.

2 The purpose of the visits was to ascertain the condition and facilities available for MPS officers and was limited to parading stations. Members had informally reported concerns from early visits to police stations. This was supplemented by the noting of the 'Disagree' response of 49% to the question 'My physical working conditions are good' in the MPS Staff Survey 2000 (the update response at December 2000 was also noted). The visits were conducted under the auspices of the MPA Human Resources Committee.

3 MPA Members are anxious to see an early improvement in working conditions for all MPS staff. Members are concerned that present working conditions at many stations probably fall well below acceptable modern standards and in some cases almost certainly contravene environmental health, occupiers' liability and Health & Safety legislation. Individual Members do not wish to see the MPA reported or summonsed and wish to act in advance of a complaint and demonstrate good faith to staff.

4 Nine locations were visited jointly between 2 March and 25 May 2001. All were parading police stations (list at Annex A). At each the locker rooms, showers and WCs were inspected. At most buildings other facilities, such as recreation rooms, fitness rooms, canteens and/or eating areas were also inspected.

5 The emphasis of this report must be the condition of changing facilities although it is acknowledged that other amenities or facilities for officers and staff are often poor. The immediate priority must be to ensure resources are directed at the improvement of changing areas, showers and WCs.

6 Sadly, we found only one station with facilities that could be described as approaching good or even reasonable (Stoke Newington). The nearest to good that either of us saw were the locker rooms at the Isle of Dogs and the PCs’ basement changing facilities at Brixton but they were far from ideal. One aspect that did impress us was the almost complete absence of offensive images or graffiti. At only one location (Kennington), did we see in a male changing area - a random centrefold illustration - on a locker door.

7 Unremittingly, all locker rooms, showers and WCs appeared uncleaned (even Stoke Newington) and dirty. In some cases the dust and dirt was blatantly evident. The smell in some WCs (ground floor male WC at Feltham noted as the worst) was appalling.

8 We were shocked by the overall state of changing and washing facilities. Surprisingly, locker rooms or changing facilities appear to be relatively recent innovations in the MPS (within the last 30-40 years). Accordingly, the majority of locker rooms are in spaces originally designated for other purposes. For example, the basement areas at Kennington now used as locker rooms were built (1955) as a cycle store and parade room. Where locker rooms are an integral part of the design of the police station, they tend to be located in the basement although in recent refurbishments they tend to be on upper floors. Mostly, the spaces used were not conceived as planned areas but simply as areas in which as many lockers as possible could be crammed together. Some have no ceilings, such as the former cycle store at Kennington, where in a cavernous space the drains, pipes and wiring for the building pass visibly and intrusively overhead. With increased demand for changing rooms, any available recess has been appropriated (women Inspectors at Charing Cross have their lockers in a former walk-in cupboard with no ventilation) and it is not unusual to see lockers placed along corridors. At Limehouse, former upper floor Section House rooms have been used (with no changes to glazing).

9 Our visits showed that it is rare to find showers close to locker rooms. Exceptional but not untypical, at Chiswick the lockers are on the third floor and the (only) shower is on the ground floor, by the back door. Many showers are located within WCs, not always the most hygienic of arrangements. Many showers had been incorporated into ingenious spaces (under stairs at Walton Street). With rare exceptions all showers looked dirty and in need of a clean. Virtually all showers were single, but at Charing Cross we noted communal showers for PCs with dividing curtains in the female showers but no similar privacy within the male showers.

10 The cleaning problem extended to other communal areas, such as food preparation spaces. By far the worst observed was Walton Street, where the dirt-encrusted state of the gas cooker (which we were told had been out of use for about six months) reflected shame on the MPS. Nearby, the floor of the refrigerator alcove was flooded (and had been for several days). As representatives of the MPA, the body ultimately liable at law for these conditions, we were shocked and an immediate report was filed.

11 In addition to the primary purpose of our visits, we saw - in passing - a number of fitness rooms and other recreational spaces (such as snooker rooms and, occasionally, TV rooms). Again, we found poor cleaning and maintenance. We were told constantly that police officers tend to break anything supplied to them but we were at a loss to understand why equipment, finishes and furnishings cannot be specified at a standard appropriate to the constant and intensive use they receive. Initial higher outlay will be offset by reduced repair and early replacement costs.

12 We were told at several stations that social club members had paid for fitness equipment or supplied other amenities. It was noticeable that at those stations the facilities were in better condition. We would be grateful for clarification of MPS policy and we recommend that a consistent arrangement for the supply and maintenance of fitness equipment, TVs and other social amenities should apply at all MPS buildings. (Recommendation 10)

13 Also in passing we noted varying practice in respect of OCU archive filing. In some stations, open racking with archived books, files and papers was observed in rooms or areas used mainly for other purposes (particularly recreational). At a few stations (most notably Stoke Newington) proper secure arrangements for archive filing had been made. We were concerned that the MPS lacks a consistent approach, policy or standards. We recommend an urgent review of OCU archive filing arrangements. (Recommendation 11)

14 We were uncertain about the reasons for the overall poor standards. We do not seek to apportion blame or, indeed, would it be appropriate to do so. The fact is, that beyond doubt, the MPS has a big problem and it must take urgent steps to address the issue. We received conflicting information about responsibility; the Director of Resources suggested the OCUs received funding from centre for building works and it was a delegated decision as to how monies were spent. The OCU staffs claimed that so little finance was available that it failed to provide in any one year even the most important requirements. There was simply no scope for works to be undertaken.

15 For us, the issue was straightforward. It is fact that conditions range mostly from poor to downright disgraceful (e.g. Old Street & Walton Street) and that action must be taken. We recognise that budgets have been set for the present year and that there is probably insufficient capacity to mount large-scale works. However, we recommend that MPS Management Board and the MPA in principle seek to identify potential underspend monies within the present financial year to aid a staff facilities improvement programme and provide budgeted monies for future years. (Recommendation 1)

16 We recognise that achieving ideal facilities at all stations is unrealisable. The age of many buildings, with substantial load-bearing walls, will preclude incorporation of en suite facilities. The recent excellent work at Lambeth on the concept design for cells and front counters by PSD inspires us to consider that a similar project could be undertaken to produce a MPS standard design for locker rooms, showers and WCs. Like the cell project, elements of the standard design should be capable of adaptation and retrospective fitting within police stations. We recommend the devising of minimum standards for locker rooms, showers and WCs including design guidance. (Recommendation 7)

17 The present conditions are so bad that a programme must be devised by each OCU for the upgrading of all facilities to an agreed and published minimum standard within seven years. We recommend that the MPS aim to ensure all locker rooms, showers and WCs conform to minimum criteria by 31 March 2009. (Recommendation 3)

18 Dirt was evident everywhere we visited, not just in locker rooms. From this we had good reason to believe the MPS is not obtaining proper standards of performance or value under its cleaning contracts. We suspect that supervision is poor, if not non-existent. The reporting arrangements by managers of poor or under performance by cleaners appear to be awkward and cumbersome. There is little incentive to report poor performance and little prospect of fast response. We recommend that the structure of the cleaning contracts be reviewed and arrangements put in place to ensure proper on-site supervision of cleaners and their work, regular checking of performance and fast track remedies for failures to clean to agreed standards. (Recommendation 4)

19 Reviewing contracts will take time and the need is more urgent. At many locations there are current problems, such as offensive smells (ground floor at Feltham by the back door was probably the worst), and broken fittings (almost everywhere). A programme of thorough and deep cleaning is required almost immediately, particularly in showers and WCs. This should be accompanied by a minor works repair programme to replace or repair the numerous defective fittings, cracked tiling or floor surfaces. Where sanitary ware is cracked, damaged or badly stained it should be repaired or replaced. We recommend the ordering of a MPS-wide deep cleaning programme of all showers and WCs together with a minor works repair programme to ensure a minimum level of cleanliness is achieved. (Recommendation 5)

20 In some cases a deep clean will do little or nothing to achieve an improvement, the present condition being so bad. Our suggestion would be the creation, during the current financial year, of a fund (identified from a potential underspend) of £1.5 million to enable F & R Managers to bid for monies to undertake qualifying package improvement schemes in the worst cases. In order to speed up the work, local labour should be utilised although PSD should be involved in the preparation of plans. Accordingly, we recommend the creation of a fund (of £1.5 million) in 2001-02 for the purpose of meeting bids for package improvements to showers and WCs. (Recommendation 7)

Note: We estimate there are probably 100 locker rooms/changing areas within the MPS in operational buildings (to include dog sections, marine section, mounted branch, TSG bases traffic branch and traffic wardens). Accordingly, the average amount available for each building would be a modest £15,000.

21 We were struck by the resigned attitudes we encountered almost everywhere. Comments such as 'nobody has ownership, therefore [locker rooms] will always be dirty and untidy', 'police officers are used to conditions like this, they know they will never change', 'boys will be boys' (a reference to male locker rooms always being noticeably untidier than female locker rooms) and 'I try my best but I can't order police officers to tidy up' (a frustrated F & R Manager) were common. The problem is acknowledged by almost everyone but, in the face of so many competing demands and priorities, there is little incentive or will to tackle the problem.

22 The issue of basic staff conditions must in future be a priority with high status. While we have little direct evidence to confirm our view that poor conditions influence attitudes at work, we believe that inevitably they must influence thinking and outlook by police officers on duty. At the same time, no part of a police building should be without 'ownership' and it should be a requirement of each Senior Management Team (SMT) to ensure minimum standards are maintained. A periodic inspection regime should be introduced for areas such as locker rooms, showers, WCs, fitness rooms, canteens or food preparation areas and we recommend that OCU commanders should make formal inspections of staff facilities at least four times a year. (Recommendation 6)

23 We observed that few mirrors or seating existed in locker rooms. For consideration as part of the minimum standards study (see paragraph 16) we recommend that mirrors (full length and head and shoulders) be provided as standard and that the placing of lockers on a projecting plinth be investigated (Recommendation 8) thereby allowing the space beneath lockers to be used for bag storage and the creation of a ledge or seat in front of each locker. We noted with concern that electric kettles were plugged in to main sockets in several (mostly female) locker rooms.

24 The majority of lockers supplied are of a standard single variety. A slightly larger version is available but it is still not adequate for the accommodation of all current kit and equipment issued. A modern 'double' locker was occasionally observed and it appeared to be appropriate for present requirements (with the exception of specialist officers such as motorcyclists). We recommend that investigations be made into the viability of the creation of a 'new for old' swap scheme where OCUs could exchange existing single lockers for double lockers at no additional or extra cost (Recommendation 12). We envisage that no incentive will otherwise exist (goodwill excepted) to oblige OCUs to replace lockers as part of general improvement programmes.

25 We deplore the current practice of the allocating of space on a 'needs must' basis for locker/changing facilities. We recommend that in future, save in exceptional circumstances, all new locker rooms must be in designated spaces conforming to minimum standards, including space and proximity to showers and WCs. (Recommendation 9)

26 In the course of our inspections, we made numerous further observations not strictly relevant to the main purpose of our visits. Three of greater significance, which cannot pass without record, are:

Notice Boards

27 Generally, external (public) or internal (staff) notice boards were mostly indifferent and not particularly well maintained, often with out of date material. At Kentish Town, the internal notice boards were of a high standard and our praise was passed directly to the officer concerned for their maintenance. We would add that we saw very few recruitment posters on display in front areas.

Food Preparation Area Lockers

28 We observed that in all food preparation areas lockers are provided for the storage of foods and consumables belonging to each shift or relief. We noted that they differed in size but all had padlocks, mostly crudely fitted. Virtually all were filthy and had been the subject of vandalism (bent doors, broken padlock arms, etc.). We were informed that there is a high rate of theft from these lockers. In the circumstances, we could not understand why the MPS, as a bulk purchaser, had not commissioned a design of locker likely to meet service requirements.

PCs’ Writing Room at Feltham

29 Within the past few years, the glazing has been replaced. Due to the absence of opening fanlights, no natural ventilation is possible and no artificial ventilation is provided. In the ordinary course the windows cannot be opened as they throw onto a public area, often frequented by young people. It is perfectly possible for a member of the public to distract, talk directly to a police officer or reach in and remove papers. We wondered why this had not been considered at the time of specification of replacement windows, and what remedial action is proposed?

27 We saw many MPS officers and civil staff during our visits. We were met with unfailing courtesy and helpfulness, extending even to assistance with the most mundane of questions. We would wish to thank all officers and staff who have assisted us.

Report author: Jennette Arnold and Nicholas Long
19 June 2001

Annex A

A Police stations visited jointly by Jennette Arnold and Nicholas Long

Charing Cross
Clapham
Feltham
Kennington
Kentish Town
Isle of Dogs
Limehouse
Stoke Newington
Walton Street

B Police stations visited singly by either Jennette Arnold or Nicholas Long

Brixton
Chiswick
Kilburn
Old Street
Streatham
Uxbridge

Appendix 2: “Changing Habits” - Response by the MPS

Summary

This report provides an initial response by the MPS to matters raised by Jennette Arnold and Nicholas Long following their review of working conditions within 15 MPS operational buildings undertaken on behalf of the MPA Human Resources Committee. The MPA report is principally concerned with improving standards of locker accommodation, showers and night cooking units (NCUs). The standard of these facilities is particularly relevant for all officers on the beat.

Comments of Changing Habits

1. These relate to the Recommendations contained in the MPA report. A comprehensive review of standards in Operational buildings is being progressed under the management of AC Tarique Ghaffur. The outcome will be reported to the MPS Management Board and to the MPA towards the end of this calendar year, together with long-term proposals for addressing the problems identified.

Recommendations 1 and 2:

2. The MPS does not anticipate any underspend of the budgets in 2001/02 but local Borough Commands will review their priorities for uncommitted expenditure in their devolved budgets that are made available for improvements to accommodation (totalling nearly £2m for 2001/02, including capital). Funding in future years should be considered alongside other priorities for the MPA and the MPS when setting these budgets.

3. Specific problems relating to Specialist Operations (‘SO’) accommodation (i.e. Walton Street) are being reviewed corporately, including the possibility of finding alternative accommodation.

Recommendation 3:

4. The cost of undertaking the improvements proposed will be significantly greater than £1.5m. There are 172 operational buildings. Approximately 20 new stations (or equivalent) have opened since 1990. Facilities were improved at a further five such buildings last year; another 11 are included in this year’s programme, and 12 already planned for future years (see Annex A). Further comprehensive improvements to upgrade standards will need to be addressed over several years and the eight years proposed should enable this to be achieved at most locations, provided sufficient funding is available. Funding for the latter four years in particular (i.e. following the implementation of C3i) could enable redundant command and control rooms to be converted, thereby creating the necessary expansion of accommodation that will be needed at many locations.

5. The problems brought about by ‘overcrowding’ have largely resulted from local decisions in response to Service Restructuring & Borough Policing. Local managers will record and review current occupancy standards.

Recommendations 4 and 5:

6. Cleaning contracts are in the process of being reviewed prior to re-tendering and this has contributed in part to deterioration in the service provided at many locations.

7. Borough OCUs already hold budgets to arrange for special cleans (including showers and WCs.) A similar arrangement will be introduced for ‘SO’. Local commands are already supported by their own cleaning supervisor (each covering six or seven boroughs). They have direct access to Carillion and to the relevant cleaning contractor. Cleaning contracts already require that all toilets, showers and bathroom floors are washed and disinfected daily and fittings weekly.

8. All local commands will undertake a review of current conditions and special cleans will be arranged where appropriate. Many boroughs now have their own local handyperson available to carry out any associated minor repair work and all have local budgets to employ local tradespeople.

Recommendation 6:

9. Local commands have a responsibility to carry out regular health and safety inspections and each building has a nominated officer with responsibility for such matters. These arrangements will be reviewed and formal inspections of staff facilities undertaken and recorded quarterly.

Recommendations 7, 8 and 9:

10. The MPS Property Services Department (PSD) already maintains minimum standards for new buildings and conversions. These exceed the standards required by the Home Office Public Buildings Designs Guide (1994), with which the MPS previously complied. Following a review undertaken by PSD, new standards have been incorporated into the design of major refurbishments and new police stations from early last year. This has doubled the space allowed for locker rooms and the number of showers (as well as increasing the number of individual showers), but it is subject to existing accommodation constraints and funding. This standard has been incorporated into the three new police stations for South East London, to be delivered through PFI. Further refinement is under consideration and a prototype is being developed at Lambeth to facilitate wider consultation.

11. Consideration will also be given to restricting the number of officers who can be located at any building, (or locker room) except in agreement with PSD.

12. Few existing locker rooms have capacity to accommodate either of the larger individual lockers to meet the current standard, or to provide seating. Additional accommodation will need to be made available within individual buildings (or nearby) to achieve the standard sought.

Recommendation 10:

13. Fitness and leisure equipment and televisions can be bought through Borough OCUs devolved furniture budgets. Suitability of fitness equipment should be assessed by the physical training instructors in Personnel Department and PSD informed to ensure maintenance of the equipment is undertaken through the corporate maintenance contract. These arrangements will be reaffirmed.

Recommendation 11:

14. A review of local archive arrangements will be undertaken as part of a wider review of conditions at all Borough OCUs. The findings will be considered in conjunction with a review of future arrangements for central Registry - currently sharing Ministry of Defence accommodation at Hayes - once the outcome of a possible PFI for this service is known.

Recommendation 12:

15. Borough OCUs have devolved furniture budgets available to deal with local priorities. The current standard lockers were introduced in 1997 following a review of requirement by PSD after the issue of personal protective clothing to officers was agreed. They are phased-in as new or refurbished accommodation becomes available, or they are bought through local budgets if considered a priority by local management. The former standard 15” lockers are replaced by 18” (450mm) lockers, with 30” (750mm) lockers for officers with greater demand (such as the Special Escort Group and the Territorial Support Group).

16. A comprehensive review of current usage will be undertaken to assess the level of demand in addition to that which will be met through the current programme of improvements to be undertaken in 2001/02 and future years. [The cost of a new 30” locker is £95. Assuming half of those officers with lockers require an upgrade, this equates to £9m - based on the larger locker and its equivalent floorspace.]

B. Other matters

1. Kitchen Standards: Catering Department is responsible for hygiene standards in kitchens but not the night cooking units (NCUs) which are for the personal use of officers and under their control. These will be included in the quarterly environmental inspections undertaken on behalf of local commands (see Recommendation 6).

2. Feltham Writing Room: The windows are bottom hung, with restrictors for safety and to prevent external access. They are adjacent to private space, albeit accessible by the public.

3. Walton Street: A separate report has been prepared for Walton Street and PSD are reviewing the possibility for finding accommodation that is more appropriate.

4. The results of a detailed review of environmental standards in operational buildings will be reported later this year.

C. Financial implications

1. Local budgets, totalling over £2.4m, are available for improving accommodation standards and acquiring new lockers. Very few bids have been made to use part of these funds to improve locker rooms. This suggests it has not been seen as a priority by local commands. The FPBV Committee has already received a report on emerging budget pressures and this was not included.

2. Planned major refurbishments for future years will incorporate the improved standards for locker rooms and showers within their cost. PSD had identified the need for £1m growth in 2002/03 to start addressing this; they have increased this to £1.5m in their budget bid but this must compete against other funding priorities.

3. The cost of providing the larger standard 30” locker is £95; or approximately £1m assuming it is required by half those police officers entitled to a locker. It will not always be possible to identify additional space for the larger lockers without funding additional accommodation. The cost increases to just over £9m if the cost of additional floorspace is included, without any allowance for benching, general refurbishment or improved shower facilities.

4. There will also be additional funding implications arising from changes in cleaning contracts and archive storage - at least in the short term, for which there is no budget.

D. Background papers

• “Changing Habits” by Jennette Arnold & Nicholas Long
• “Police Building Design Guide”(1994) - Home Office
• “PSD Furnishings” (1996)
• “PSD Police Building Standards”
• “PSD Review of Showers” (2000)

Report author: Trevor Lawrence, MPS Director of Property Services

Annex A: Locker rooms

New stations or new station equivalents since 1988

• South Norwood
• Edmonton
• Plumstead
• Forest Gate
• Islington
• Belgravia
• Bexleyheath
• Ilford
• Colindale
• West End Central
• Uxbridge
• Stoke Newington
• Charing Cross
• Fulham
• Barkingside
• Walworth
• Bethnal Green
• Hammersmith
• Isle of Dogs
• Southwark

Major refurbishments completed in 2000/01 including new locker rooms

• Lambeth SEG
• Stoke Newington
• West Hampstead stables
• North Woolwich
• Larkhall Lane TSG

Major works completed or on site during 2001/02 including new locker room accommodation

• Belvedere PS
• Holborn PS
• Chadwell Heath TSG
• Catford TSG
• Barking SCG
• Leman Street SO19
• New Malden PS
• Romford PS
• Wembley PS
• Finchley PS SO8
• Hendon SCG

Major works in programme for future years which include new locker room accommodation

• Acton PS
• Chelsea PS
• Kennington PS
• Marylebone PS
• Alperton TSG & Traffic
• Hampstead Sector Base
• Kentish Town PS
• Whetstone PS

Send an e-mail linking to this page

Feedback