You are in:

Contents

Report 6 of the 23 September 2010 meeting of the Finance and Resources committee Committee, gives a review of the financial statements 2009/10, provides the latest position of grants awarded from the Police Property Fund and seeks approval for a third consecutive year award from Brent Borough.

Warning: This is archived material and may be out of date. The Metropolitan Police Authority has been replaced by the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPC).

See the MOPC website for further information.

Police Property Act Fund

Report: 06
Date: 23 September 2010
By: Director of Resources on behalf of the Commissioner and the Treasurer

Summary

This report on the Police Property Act Fund (PPAF) gives a review of the financial statements 2009/10, provides the latest position of grants awarded 2010/11 and seeks approval for a third consecutive year award from Brent Borough.

A. Recommendations

That members

  1. Note the report on the 2009/10 annual accounts for the Police Property Act Fund
  2. Note the current position of grants awarded 2010/11
  3. Approve a third consecutive year award received from Brent Borough

B. Supporting information

Background

1. The Police (Property) Act 1897 and subsequent Police (Property) Regulations 1997 apply to property that is in the possession of police where the owner of the property cannot be identified and where no order of a competent court has been made.

2. Subject to the provisions of the 1997 Regulations the proceeds of all sales are retained separately in the Police Property Act Fund (the PPAF). The income derived from funds invested is added to and becomes part of the PPAF.

3. The PPAF may then be used to meet the expenses incurred in the conveyance, storage, safe custody and sale of the property and to make payments for charitable purpose. The PPAF meets direct cost expenditure, such as auction costs, and a 2009/10 notional administration charge of £100,000 to the MPS.

4. Additionally cash that has been seized for the purpose of a criminal investigation and retained in order to establish its lawful owner and where there are reasonable grounds for believing that it has been obtained in consequence of an offence is held in the Detained Monies Account (DMA). Detained money is retained until directions are received from a Court or, if a case does not reach a hearing, from the officer in the case. This does not include cash sums seized and detained under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (and subsequent amendments) and administered separately within Finance Services.

Annual Accounts 2009/10

5. Finance and Resources Committee on 22 April 2010 requested that the annual accounts be presented to the Committee sooner after the year end than was previously the case. The appointed auditor has prepared the financial statements in sufficient time to allow reporting to this Committee.

6. There are two sets of annual accounts, recognising the distinction between the DMA and sums that are appropriate to the PPAF. In accordance with financial safeguards established by Finance Committee in February 2004 copies of the PPAF and the DMA 2009/10 annual accounts have been submitted to the MPA Treasurer. A summary of the PPAF income and expenditure account 2009/10 and balance sheet as at 31 March 2010 are set out at Appendix 1.

7. The estimated final position and details of all of the awards made were provided to Finance Committee on 22 April 2010 and are not restated here. There were no adjustments to the final figure for grants awarded in year of £292k, against an allocation of £300k, a 97% take up of grants by boroughs.

8. The 2009/10 surplus is largely a result of six year old deposits retained in the DMA being transferred to the PPAF. Legal advice determined that such deposits, retained in police possession in excess of six year where no claim has been received, could be considered as PPAF money. At 1 April 2009 sums detained in the 12 months to 31 March 2003 were reclassified resulting in a transfer of £1,919k from the DMA to the PPAF. (Additionally, at 1 April 2010 sums detained in the twelve months to 31 March 2004 were reclassified resulting in the transfer of £930k from the DMA to the PPAF).

9. The financial outturn for 2010/11, along with predicted income and expenditure going forward, will determine the recommendations made to Finance Committee in April 2011 for the 2011/12 allocation to boroughs.

Update on the PPAF Grant Budget 2010/11

10. On 22 April 2010 Finance and Resources Committee agreed a 2010/11 grant allocation of £600k to boroughs and £10k to Royal Parks, a total of £610k. To date (end of August 2010) £180k of grants have been approved, representing nearly 30% of the allocation. The 2010/11 allocation was double that of the previous year and Finance Services are monitoring closely the value of requests received from boroughs. With regular reminders sent to boroughs about their remaining 2010/11 allocations indications are that boroughs will be able to identify suitable causes to receive PPAF funding.

Third year allocation request from Brent

11. The PPAF guidelines state that a grant will not be awarded to an organisation for more than two consecutive years but recognises that there may be occasions when appropriate opportunities are limited. In circumstances where a borough has difficulty in making varied awards the carry over of the allowance to the next financial year, or a further award to an organisation that has already received an award for two consecutive years, will be allowed but subject to approval by Finance Committee. In 2008/09 and 2009/10 Brent have awarded £10k each year to the Kickz project and requests approval to award a further grant in 2010/11 to this project.

12. The primary partners of the Kickz project are the Football Foundation, the Premier League and the MPS. The project uses football and the appeal of professional football clubs to engage young people who may otherwise be difficult to reach.
13. Brent’s allocated funding for 2010/11 is £23.82k and the borough is requesting that further support can be provided to Kickz from this allocation.

C. Other organisational & community implications

Equality and diversity impact

1. Grants are awarded to organisations whose work encourages the development of positive relationships between members of the local communities and the police, especially those sections of the community which are currently under-represented in the MPS, to improve informed community engagement in the policing of London.

2. Organisations awarded grants also promote equality and diversity both in their employment practices and service delivery and should not seek to promote or oppose any religion or religious belief.

Consideration of MET Forward

3. Grants are awarded to organisations whose work supports people who are or have been victims of crime or vulnerable to crime. Grants are also awarded to improve the quality of life for residents by initiatives which prevent crime or reduce the fear of crime and which divert people, especially young people, away from crime.

Financial implications

4. There are no financial implications in relation to the Metropolitan Police Authority Fund. The financial implications for the Police Property Act Fund are addressed above.

Legal implications

5. The role of the MPA in the administration of the Police Property Act Fund is to:

  1. nominate an auditor;
  2. set the amount of compensation to be paid to persons delivering property to the police;
  3. direct the investment of the money held in the PPAF;
  4. authorise the MPS to retain property (other than money) for police purposes; and
  5. determine the amounts to be paid for charitable purposes
  6. The MPA’s responsibilities are delegated to MPS Director of Finance Services subject to certain consultation and reporting requirements.
  7. The Treasurer of the MPA receives a copy of the PPAF annual accounts and must be consulted regarding policy and contentious issues.
  8. This report is submitted as part of this governance process and no legal implications arise.

Risk implications

6. The annual allocation from the Police Property Act Fund that is identified for distribution for charitable purposes is determined having considered the current and estimated financial position of the Fund thereby ensuring that the Fund is able to meet all its obligations. Budget monitoring and administrative processes ensure compliance with the published guidelines and the annual audit of the Fund provides the additional assurance that the operation of the Fund is compliant with legislative requirements.

D. Background papers

  • Finance Committee 20 April 2006
  • Finance and Resources Committee 22 April 2010

E. Contact details

Report author(s): Paul Daly, Director of Exchequer Services, MPS

For more information contact:

MPA general: 020 7202 0202
Media enquiries: 020 7202 0217/18

Supporting material

Send an e-mail linking to this page

Feedback